<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>dropsafe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com</link>
	<description>network security, unix and bicycles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:47:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Wanted: #Cycle routes to cross the M4 near #Reading / #Rdg between J10 and J12? + Footbridge?</title>
		<link>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5872</link>
		<comments>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5872#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alecm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/?p=5872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The point where the A33 crosses over the M4 at Junction 11 is pretty hideous for cyclists; the roundabout is filled with fast traffic, its six lanes wide at points, and frankly it seems wisest to steer clear if crossing the motorway North/South. So what are the alternatives, in an area between J10 and J12? [...]<p>this posting is syndicated from dropsafe
<br/><br/><a href="http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5872">Wanted: #Cycle routes to cross the M4 near #Reading / #Rdg between J10 and J12? + Footbridge?</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point where <a href="http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?q=RG2+0FL&#038;hl=en&#038;ll=51.41409,-0.979328&#038;spn=0.031209,0.073042&#038;hnear=Reading+RG2+0FL,+United+Kingdom&#038;t=m&#038;z=14">the A33 crosses over the M4</a> at Junction 11 is pretty hideous for cyclists; the roundabout is filled with fast traffic, its six lanes wide at points, and frankly it seems wisest to steer clear if crossing the motorway North/South.</p>
<p>So what are the alternatives, in an area between J10 and J12? </p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>To the west is Burghfield Road, apparently under the motorway, and even further west is an unclassified road near a couple of large pools which appear to bracket the motorway.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Closer to J11 but still to the west is Kirton&#8217;s Farm / Kybes Lane, a bridge over the M4.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>To the east of J11 there <a href="http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?q=RG2+0FL&#038;hl=en&#038;ll=51.412246,-0.95742&#038;spn=0.001951,0.004565&#038;hnear=Reading+RG2+0FL,+United+Kingdom&#038;t=h&#038;z=18">appears to be a footbridge</a> over the M4, hung off Old Whitley Wood Lane; you can&#8217;t tell from imagery how accessible this would be to a large bike like a tandem.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Further east again is Shinfield Road, the A327, which is rather major</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Then there&#8217;s Cutbrush Lane into Lower Earley.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Finally: Mill Lane near Sindlesham, King St Lane (ditto), and the A329 Reading Road into Wokingham.</p></blockquote>
</li>
</ul>
<p>So which of these are nice cycle rides?  And &#8211; from an alternative transport viewpoint &#8211; can you get a large tandem or tricycle over the Old Whitley footbridge?</p>
<p>this posting is syndicated from dropsafe
<br/><br/><a href="http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5872">Wanted: #Cycle routes to cross the M4 near #Reading / #Rdg between J10 and J12? + Footbridge?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5872/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did you hear the one about the opera-singing duck?</title>
		<link>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5855</link>
		<comments>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5855#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alecm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[fun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/?p=5855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was a bass canard. this posting is syndicated from dropsafe Did you hear the one about the opera-singing duck?<p>this posting is syndicated from dropsafe
<br/><br/><a href="http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5855">Did you hear the one about the opera-singing duck?</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a bass canard.</p>
<p>this posting is syndicated from dropsafe
<br/><br/><a href="http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5855">Did you hear the one about the opera-singing duck?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5855/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>There&#8217;s a PhD to be had in the sub-vocal interruption noises made by @BBCr4Today presenters to cut-off interviewees</title>
		<link>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5867</link>
		<comments>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5867#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alecm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[miscellaneous ranting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/?p=5867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m certain of it. The faint awright of Justin Webb, the nnght of Jim Naughtie. There&#8217;s an entire control psychology in there. this posting is syndicated from dropsafe There&#8217;s a PhD to be had in the sub-vocal interruption noises made by @BBCr4Today presenters to cut-off interviewees<p>this posting is syndicated from dropsafe
<br/><br/><a href="http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5867">There&#8217;s a PhD to be had in the sub-vocal interruption noises made by @BBCr4Today presenters to cut-off interviewees</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m certain of it.  </p>
<p>The faint <em>awright</em> of Justin Webb, the <em>nnght</em> of Jim Naughtie.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s an entire control psychology in there.</p>
<p>this posting is syndicated from dropsafe
<br/><br/><a href="http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5867">There&#8217;s a PhD to be had in the sub-vocal interruption noises made by @BBCr4Today presenters to cut-off interviewees</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5867/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Fleet St and @tom_watson&#8217;s breaking #Leveson-based #Nightjack enquiry into at hacking at The Times&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5864</link>
		<comments>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5864#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 08:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alecm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/?p=5864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I hear on Radio 4 that there&#8217;s some breaking news that: Not only Tabloids but perhaps also Broadsheets were hacking for stories! &#8230;I think of many boozy evenings in 2011 hanging out with journos and being unanimously told that: They were all at it. The lot of them. Without exception. Even the &#8216;good&#8217; guys. [...]<p>this posting is syndicated from dropsafe
<br/><br/><a href="http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5864">On Fleet St and @tom_watson&#8217;s breaking #Leveson-based #Nightjack enquiry into at hacking at The Times&#8230;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I hear on Radio 4 that there&#8217;s some <em>breaking news</em> that:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Not only Tabloids but perhaps also Broadsheets were hacking for stories!</em></p></blockquote>
<p>&#8230;I think of many boozy evenings in 2011 hanging out with journos and being unanimously told that:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>They were all at it. The lot of them. Without exception. Even the &#8216;good&#8217; guys. Mine&#8217;s a G&amp;T.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>So I am not surprised by the news that John Humphrys (or, indeed Jim Naughtie) presented this morning; but I do wonder precisely <em>&#8220;what is going through his head&#8221;</em> when he&#8217;s reading it out?  </p>
<p>Is it perhaps like a bedtime story where he already knows the story&#8217;s punchline, and all the details, but is being forced by circumstance to turn over one fat page per month because we kiddies may only be told the tale&#8230; ONE&#8230; SLOW&#8230; WORD&#8230; AT&#8230; A&#8230; TIME?</p>
<p>And what is it that dictates the pace &#8211; the media under investigation? The police? Some dripping stream of embarrassment which wells-up and occasionally bursts its banks, permitting us all to scream &#8220;OH, REALLY?&#8221; in some pantomime of surprise?</p>
<p>Does it really require an enquiry to follow the story?</p>
<p>It makes me sick.  </p>
<p>this posting is syndicated from dropsafe
<br/><br/><a href="http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5864">On Fleet St and @tom_watson&#8217;s breaking #Leveson-based #Nightjack enquiry into at hacking at The Times&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5864/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flying People in New York City &#8211; YouTube</title>
		<link>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5857</link>
		<comments>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5857#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alecm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[fun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/?p=5857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[via Flying People in New York City &#8211; YouTube. Best in full screen. this posting is syndicated from dropsafe Flying People in New York City &#8211; YouTube<p>this posting is syndicated from dropsafe
<br/><br/><a href="http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5857">Flying People in New York City &#8211; YouTube</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/dcDN409ZBv4?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>via <a href='http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&#038;v=dcDN409ZBv4'>Flying People in New York City &#8211; YouTube</a>.</p>
<p>Best in full screen.</p>
<p>this posting is syndicated from dropsafe
<br/><br/><a href="http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5857">Flying People in New York City &#8211; YouTube</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5857/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>#Trekkies debate whether &#8216;The Next Generation&#8217; or &#8216;Deep Space 9&#8242; first allowed female starship captains&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5852</link>
		<comments>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5852#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alecm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[skeptics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/?p=5852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;because &#8216;The Original Series&#8216; certainly didn&#8217;t: link link link So we heard last week that the Royal Enclosure at Ascot will be enforcing a stricter dress code this year. They will be cracking down in particular on ladies hats. Ladies attempting to enter the Royal Enclosure wearing a fascinator instead of a hat will be [...]<p>this posting is syndicated from dropsafe
<br/><br/><a href="http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5852">#Trekkies debate whether &#8216;The Next Generation&#8217; or &#8216;Deep Space 9&#8242; first allowed female starship captains&#8230;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;because &#8216;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church">The Original Series</a>&#8216; certainly didn&#8217;t:</p>
<p><a href="http://churchmousepublishing.blogspot.com/2012/01/ladies-hats.html">link</a> <a href="http://churchmousepublishing.blogspot.com/2010/06/women-bishops-archbishops-have-new.html">link</a> <a href="http://ramtopsrac.wordpress.com/2012/01/29/my-letter-to-members-of-general-synod-gensyn-synod/">link</a></p>
<blockquote><p>So we heard last week that the Royal Enclosure at Ascot will be enforcing a stricter dress code this year.  They will be cracking down in particular on ladies hats.  Ladies attempting to enter the Royal Enclosure wearing a fascinator instead of a hat will be turned away.</p>
<p>Similarly, the Church of England has enforced a strict had code amongst its clergy for some time.  Women are allowed to wear any hat except for an episcopal mitre.  The pointy hat that shows you are a bishop has been strictly reserved for men.</p>
<p>And next week, the General Synod of the Church of England will be meeting and one of the most important votes on the subject of women bishops [...]
</p></blockquote>
<p>this posting is syndicated from dropsafe
<br/><br/><a href="http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5852">#Trekkies debate whether &#8216;The Next Generation&#8217; or &#8216;Deep Space 9&#8242; first allowed female starship captains&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5852/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>#Routerpwn &#8211; exploitation of vulnerabilities in home routers and other embedded devices &#8211; yummy #security&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5848</link>
		<comments>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5848#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 06:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alecm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/?p=5848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[to be tested&#8230; Routerpwn. Routerpwn is a web application that aids with the exploitation of vulnerabilities in home routers and other embedded devices. It is a compilation of local and remote exploits ready to run at the click of a button. The current release is v1.0 and contains 84 exploits which can be run locally [...]<p>this posting is syndicated from dropsafe
<br/><br/><a href="http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5848">#Routerpwn &#8211; exploitation of vulnerabilities in home routers and other embedded devices &#8211; yummy #security&#8230;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to be tested&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p><a href='http://websec.ca/news/routerpwn_framework'>Routerpwn</a>.</p>
<p>Routerpwn is a web application that aids with the exploitation of vulnerabilities in home routers and other embedded devices.</p>
<p>It is a compilation of local and remote exploits ready to run at the click of a button. The current release is v1.0 and contains 84 exploits which can be run locally by using the default internal IP address or remotely by specifying a remote IP address from which to run the exploit.</p>
<p>Routerpwn is written in pure JavaScript and HTML, with the idea of being able to run it on any device. It has been optimized to run on mobile devices, such as smartphones and tablets. Furthermore, it has been successfully tested on televisions, gaming consoles and old cell phones.
</p></blockquote>
<p>this posting is syndicated from dropsafe
<br/><br/><a href="http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5848">#Routerpwn &#8211; exploitation of vulnerabilities in home routers and other embedded devices &#8211; yummy #security&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5848/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I have to try this just for the inner 5-year-old &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5844</link>
		<comments>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5844#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 23:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alecm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/?p=5844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My five year-old mind would&#8217;ve been blown&#8230; : pics. this posting is syndicated from dropsafe I have to try this just for the inner 5-year-old &#8230;<p>this posting is syndicated from dropsafe
<br/><br/><a href="http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5844">I have to try this just for the inner 5-year-old &#8230;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://i.imgur.com/3yDQZ.jpg" class="alignnone" width="398" height="605" /></p>
<p><a href='http://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/oz9st/my_five_yearold_mind_wouldve_been_blown/'>My five year-old mind would&#8217;ve been blown&#8230; : pics</a>.</p>
<p>this posting is syndicated from dropsafe
<br/><br/><a href="http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5844">I have to try this just for the inner 5-year-old &#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5844/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FLASH: Stephen #Hester to decline his #RBS bonus.  Shall we take bets that there&#8217;s a #peerage in the offing ?</title>
		<link>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5840</link>
		<comments>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5840#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 22:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alecm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/?p=5840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just announced on the Westminster Hour, Radio 4. £963,000 should buy a fairly comfy seat&#8230; this posting is syndicated from dropsafe FLASH: Stephen #Hester to decline his #RBS bonus. Shall we take bets that there&#8217;s a #peerage in the offing ?<p>this posting is syndicated from dropsafe
<br/><br/><a href="http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5840">FLASH: Stephen #Hester to decline his #RBS bonus.  Shall we take bets that there&#8217;s a #peerage in the offing ?</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just announced on the Westminster Hour, Radio 4. </p>
<p>£963,000 should buy a fairly comfy seat&#8230; <img src='http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>this posting is syndicated from dropsafe
<br/><br/><a href="http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5840">FLASH: Stephen #Hester to decline his #RBS bonus.  Shall we take bets that there&#8217;s a #peerage in the offing ?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5840/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chicken as a 3-day meal</title>
		<link>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5835</link>
		<comments>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5835#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alecm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/?p=5835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[roasted with spuds leftovers stock -> risotto, broth, soup This somewhat offsets the investment in the meat &#8211; spending nearly a tenner on a really good bird gets you amortised to 3x ~ £3.30 &#8230; this posting is syndicated from dropsafe Chicken as a 3-day meal<p>this posting is syndicated from dropsafe
<br/><br/><a href="http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5835">Chicken as a 3-day meal</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ol>
<li>roasted with spuds</li>
<li>leftovers</li>
<li>stock -> risotto, broth, soup</li>
</ol>
<p>This somewhat offsets the investment in the meat &#8211; spending nearly a tenner on a really good bird gets you amortised to 3x ~ £3.30 &#8230;</p>
<p>this posting is syndicated from dropsafe
<br/><br/><a href="http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5835">Chicken as a 3-day meal</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5835/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My eldest sister&#8217;s five rules of negotiation with software vendors</title>
		<link>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5832</link>
		<comments>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5832#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 15:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alecm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/?p=5832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quote: I am smarter than you. I am better than you. I am relentless. I will outlast you. And, I do not care how much you hate me. Sounds vaguely familiar&#8230; this posting is syndicated from dropsafe My eldest sister&#8217;s five rules of negotiation with software vendors<p>this posting is syndicated from dropsafe
<br/><br/><a href="http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5832">My eldest sister&#8217;s five rules of negotiation with software vendors</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5792/comment-page-1#comment-27271">Quote</a>:</p>
<blockquote><ol>
<li>I am smarter than you.</li>
<li>I am better than you.</li>
<li>I am relentless.</li>
<li>I will outlast you.</li>
<li>And, I do not care how much you hate me.</li>
</ol>
</blockquote>
<p>Sounds vaguely familiar&#8230;</p>
<p>this posting is syndicated from dropsafe
<br/><br/><a href="http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5832">My eldest sister&#8217;s five rules of negotiation with software vendors</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5832/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to have an epic day&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5820</link>
		<comments>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5820#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alecm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[home]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/?p=5820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Buy new tyres as a belated-but-relevant gift for god/less/son. Buy lots of meat. Visit. Fit tyres, spend afternoon overhauling bike, identify future requirements. Return home. Starter: Pickled garlic, pickled chilis, fresh parmesan slices, French butter, oatcakes. Glass Minervois. Chicken roasting in oven w/ lemon, spuds and half-peeled shallots. Pork belly strips in fridge, awaiting future [...]<p>this posting is syndicated from dropsafe
<br/><br/><a href="http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5820">How to have an epic day&#8230;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ol>
<li>Buy new tyres as a belated-but-relevant gift for god/less/son.</li>
<li>Buy lots of meat.</li>
<li>Visit.  Fit tyres, spend afternoon overhauling bike, identify future requirements.</li>
<li>Return home.</li>
<li>Starter: Pickled garlic, pickled chilis, fresh parmesan slices, French butter, oatcakes.</li>
<li>Glass Minervois.</li>
<li>Chicken roasting in oven w/ lemon, spuds and half-peeled shallots.</li>
<li>Pork belly strips in fridge, awaiting <a href="http://wanderingchopsticks.blogspot.com/2007/01/thit-heolon-kho-voi-trung-hoac-gai-chua.html">future experimentation</a>.</li>
<li>Enjoy watching recently erased Sony VAIO trying fruitlessly to boot Windows.</li>
</ol>
<p>Next up: roast chicken dinner, then movie&#8230;</p>
<p>this posting is syndicated from dropsafe
<br/><br/><a href="http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5820">How to have an epic day&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5820/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Regards BBC security &#8220;background music&#8221; &#8211; http://goo.gl/Z9FIv &#8211; have lodged a message with &#8220;Feedback&#8221;&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5817</link>
		<comments>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5817#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 12:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alecm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/?p=5817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#8217;s see if anything happens. this posting is syndicated from dropsafe Regards BBC security &#8220;background music&#8221; &#8211; http://goo.gl/Z9FIv &#8211; have lodged a message with &#8220;Feedback&#8221;&#8230;<p>this posting is syndicated from dropsafe
<br/><br/><a href="http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5817">Regards BBC security &#8220;background music&#8221; &#8211; http://goo.gl/Z9FIv &#8211; have lodged a message with &#8220;Feedback&#8221;&#8230;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see if <a href="http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5806">anything happens</a>.</p>
<p>this posting is syndicated from dropsafe
<br/><br/><a href="http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5817">Regards BBC security &#8220;background music&#8221; &#8211; http://goo.gl/Z9FIv &#8211; have lodged a message with &#8220;Feedback&#8221;&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5817/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Upside Down, Left To Right: A Letterpress Film on Vimeo</title>
		<link>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5814</link>
		<comments>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5814#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 11:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alecm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[fun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/?p=5814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Upside Down, Left To Right: A Letterpress Film from Danny Cooke on Vimeo. this posting is syndicated from dropsafe Upside Down, Left To Right: A Letterpress Film on Vimeo<p>this posting is syndicated from dropsafe
<br/><br/><a href="http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5814">Upside Down, Left To Right: A Letterpress Film on Vimeo</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/35688592?byline=0&amp;portrait=0&amp;color=ffffff" width="400" height="225" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe>
<p><a href="http://vimeo.com/35688592">Upside Down, Left To Right: A Letterpress Film</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/dannycooke">Danny Cooke</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p>
<p>this posting is syndicated from dropsafe
<br/><br/><a href="http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5814">Upside Down, Left To Right: A Letterpress Film on Vimeo</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5814/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shit Programmers Say &#8211; definitely the last worth watching in the genre http://goo.gl/Idq8W</title>
		<link>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5811</link>
		<comments>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5811#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 09:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alecm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[fun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/?p=5811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ll spare you the embed. HT @perrymetzger this posting is syndicated from dropsafe Shit Programmers Say &#8211; definitely the last worth watching in the genre http://goo.gl/Idq8W<p>this posting is syndicated from dropsafe
<br/><br/><a href="http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5811">Shit Programmers Say &#8211; definitely the last worth watching in the genre http://goo.gl/Idq8W</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll spare you the <a href="http://goo.gl/Idq8W">embed</a>. HT @perrymetzger </p>
<p>this posting is syndicated from dropsafe
<br/><br/><a href="http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5811">Shit Programmers Say &#8211; definitely the last worth watching in the genre http://goo.gl/Idq8W</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5811/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Here&#8217;s how @BBCr4today @BBCRoryCJ @ruskin147 are *not* helping the challenge of network security education&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5806</link>
		<comments>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5806#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 09:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alecm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/?p=5806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So a package on Radio4&#8242;s Today programme about the (subjective opinion!) ludicrous &#8220;right to be forgotten&#8221; &#8211; and they wheel out the usual suspects: Cluley to nitpick Gmail&#8217;s advertising parser, Gus Hosein of Privacy International, and Jeff Jarvis for the optimist. I suspect this is what the BBC called &#8220;balanced opinion&#8221; &#8211; and you know [...]<p>this posting is syndicated from dropsafe
<br/><br/><a href="http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5806">Here&#8217;s how @BBCr4today @BBCRoryCJ @ruskin147 are *not* helping the challenge of network security education&#8230;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So a package on Radio4&#8242;s Today programme about the (subjective opinion!) ludicrous &#8220;right to be forgotten&#8221; &#8211; and they wheel out the usual suspects: Cluley to nitpick Gmail&#8217;s advertising parser, <a href="https://www.privacyinternational.org/blogs/gus">Gus Hosein</a> of Privacy International, and Jeff Jarvis for the optimist.</p>
<p>I suspect this is what the BBC called &#8220;balanced opinion&#8221; &#8211; and you know what, I&#8217;d agree, it was a nice package.</p>
<p>BUT: it was laced-over with plinky-plonky spooky &#8220;psycho&#8221;-type music,  bracketing it with <em>FEAR</em>!  <strong>FEAR! FEAR! FEAR! YOU SHOULD BE SCARED OF ALL THIS CYBER PRIVACY INVASION! I AM A BBC PRODUCER AND DON&#8217;T GET IT SO IT MUST BE SCARY!</strong></p>
<p>If Rory approved the music then the Geek community should flatly disown him &#8211; you would <em>not</em> do the same to (say) a package on Government immigration policy:</p>
<blockquote><p><code>Foreigners are coming! FX: SPOOKY MUSIC</code></p></blockquote>
<p>- there would be uproar!</p>
<p>In 1995 I participated in a Open University TV programme re: Security (along with Gene Spafford, Mark Lomas, Brian Neale and Whit Diffie) and back <em>then</em> it would have been vaguely excusable for the novelty; but now, NO, please, stop it. </p>
<p>Please get with the programme; some of us are trying to get people to take this seriously, and the BBC does not have the excuse which a print journalist once gave me in 1995 &#8211; the requirement to pander to its demographic to retain advertising revenue driving reinforcement of existing prejudices.</p>
<p>The young generation can cope with privacy issues just fine &#8211; in an industry where the world turns upside down every 5 years then all legislation will be knee-jerk. Feeding fear will make it worse.</p>
<p>Regarding privacy: yes there will be a few goofs as people learn to cope with change, but having a bunch of 50 year old journalists telling a 50 year old demographic that <em>something needs to be done</em> is a task best left to the Daily Mail where we can ignore it.</p>
<p>this posting is syndicated from dropsafe
<br/><br/><a href="http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5806">Here&#8217;s how @BBCr4today @BBCRoryCJ @ruskin147 are *not* helping the challenge of network security education&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5806/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

