<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You and Your Phone are Huge Threats to the Net #security #privacy #tor #dns &#8211; HT @rdggeek @techhub @doctorow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5420/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5420</link>
	<description>network security, digital rights and bicycles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:20:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: YAY: &#8220;Android X server « my20percent&#8221; # X-Windows On Android. Phones are becoming Workstations are becoming Servers. &#124; dropsafe</title>
		<link>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5420/comment-page-1#comment-50407</link>
		<dc:creator>YAY: &#8220;Android X server « my20percent&#8221; # X-Windows On Android. Phones are becoming Workstations are becoming Servers. &#124; dropsafe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 11:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/?p=5420#comment-50407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] &#8230;now where have I heard of the desirability of that before? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8230;now where have I heard of the desirability of that before? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Walker</title>
		<link>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5420/comment-page-1#comment-34975</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 16:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/?p=5420#comment-34975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, and DNS has been A Bad Thing, for a long time (although maybe not its entire life). DNSSEC isn&#039;t much better. If IPv6 address space was a bit bigger, you could go all Hofstadter in it and turn the numbers into a vocabulary; as it is, people in Internet-disconnected environments will, anyway. IPv6 as a conduit of more-than-addressing info, while being an abuse of the standard, has considerable virtue in disconnected systems.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and DNS has been A Bad Thing, for a long time (although maybe not its entire life). DNSSEC isn&#8217;t much better. If IPv6 address space was a bit bigger, you could go all Hofstadter in it and turn the numbers into a vocabulary; as it is, people in Internet-disconnected environments will, anyway. IPv6 as a conduit of more-than-addressing info, while being an abuse of the standard, has considerable virtue in disconnected systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Walker</title>
		<link>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5420/comment-page-1#comment-34973</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 16:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/?p=5420#comment-34973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A quick collation of some thoughts sparked off by this and other events:

* you&#039;re spot on, with your statement that your typical smartphone is potentially a little Linux- or BSD-based server.
* part of the reason that smartphone connectivity is unidirectional-initiate (you can connect from your &#039;phone to the Internet, but not vice versa) is down to cacheing proxies and the need for many-to-1 NAT; the latter is mostly imposed by IPv4.
* iOS 6 will have IPv6 over wi-fi and LTE (the presenters don&#039;t mention it, but freeze-frame the Apple WWDC keynote video at 107.13); Android ICS has it too (from results of a straight Google search). When the telcos themselves go IPv6, they can keep the cacheing proxies on one side for bandwidth conservation, but it&#039;s &quot;bye-bye NAT, hello bidirectionally-initiated IPv6&quot;.
*  I&#039;m hoping the sudden ability for very many people to go self-hosting will see more notice taken of the Mine! project - especially as security-conscious Brits will want to host their own medical records rather than let the NHS keep them (unless Dame Fiona Caldicott injects some sense into current NHS proposals)
* there will naturally be security concerns from smartphone vendors, about setting them up as servers and thus making them more readily attackable. ARM TrustZone is going to help, rather a lot. Power consumption issues could be interesting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A quick collation of some thoughts sparked off by this and other events:</p>
<p>* you&#8217;re spot on, with your statement that your typical smartphone is potentially a little Linux- or BSD-based server.<br />
* part of the reason that smartphone connectivity is unidirectional-initiate (you can connect from your &#8216;phone to the Internet, but not vice versa) is down to cacheing proxies and the need for many-to-1 NAT; the latter is mostly imposed by IPv4.<br />
* iOS 6 will have IPv6 over wi-fi and LTE (the presenters don&#8217;t mention it, but freeze-frame the Apple WWDC keynote video at 107.13); Android ICS has it too (from results of a straight Google search). When the telcos themselves go IPv6, they can keep the cacheing proxies on one side for bandwidth conservation, but it&#8217;s &#8220;bye-bye NAT, hello bidirectionally-initiated IPv6&#8243;.<br />
*  I&#8217;m hoping the sudden ability for very many people to go self-hosting will see more notice taken of the Mine! project &#8211; especially as security-conscious Brits will want to host their own medical records rather than let the NHS keep them (unless Dame Fiona Caldicott injects some sense into current NHS proposals)<br />
* there will naturally be security concerns from smartphone vendors, about setting them up as servers and thus making them more readily attackable. ARM TrustZone is going to help, rather a lot. Power consumption issues could be interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Privacy is personal &#124; Customer Commons</title>
		<link>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5420/comment-page-1#comment-31114</link>
		<dc:creator>Privacy is personal &#124; Customer Commons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 03:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/?p=5420#comment-31114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Link contracts in XDI. The stuff Alec Muffett starts talking about in Slide 47 of his presentation here. As ordinary folk we don&#8217;t need to understand those things, but it helps to know that [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Link contracts in XDI. The stuff Alec Muffett starts talking about in Slide 47 of his presentation here. As ordinary folk we don&#8217;t need to understand those things, but it helps to know that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What I think is wrong with #VRM &#8211; HT @nzn @glynmoody @windley @dsearls @adriana872 &#8211; dropsafe</title>
		<link>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5420/comment-page-1#comment-30963</link>
		<dc:creator>What I think is wrong with #VRM &#8211; HT @nzn @glynmoody @windley @dsearls @adriana872 &#8211; dropsafe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 20:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/?p=5420#comment-30963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] fundamental requirements for truly personal platforms are not yet with us. Controlling your data unfortunately means being in physical control of it, or at least of the keys [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] fundamental requirements for truly personal platforms are not yet with us. Controlling your data unfortunately means being in physical control of it, or at least of the keys [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everybody: Start the timer until @scobleizer invents^H^H^H^H^H^H^H rediscovers blogging and individual data ownership &#8211; dropsafe</title>
		<link>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5420/comment-page-1#comment-27367</link>
		<dc:creator>Everybody: Start the timer until @scobleizer invents^H^H^H^H^H^H^H rediscovers blogging and individual data ownership &#8211; dropsafe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 11:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/?p=5420#comment-27367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] know what the next U-turn of the herd will entail, but on the basis of experiment &#8211; and some very hopeful observations about LTE/next generation phones &#8211; I am willing to bet that mobile will be the next [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] know what the next U-turn of the herd will entail, but on the basis of experiment &#8211; and some very hopeful observations about LTE/next generation phones &#8211; I am willing to bet that mobile will be the next [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alecm</title>
		<link>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5420/comment-page-1#comment-27324</link>
		<dc:creator>alecm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/?p=5420#comment-27324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some hope from an audience member at Reading Skeptics tonight; his take was that 4g (aka: LTE) networking is going to be so fast, and provide such bandwidth to the handsets, that websites will start to replace apps and that phone-to-website latency will be in the order of 10ms - which is below the threshold of human perception.

For this to work - says he, persuasively - the phone companies will have to rip out much of the  latency-inducing intermediate NAT and other session-based crap, moving instead to pure IPv6 solutions. 

Whether this will fully presage running webservers on your phones is unclear - still it would be good to have demand so that technology is nudged that way - but it&#039;s a step in the right direction.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some hope from an audience member at Reading Skeptics tonight; his take was that 4g (aka: LTE) networking is going to be so fast, and provide such bandwidth to the handsets, that websites will start to replace apps and that phone-to-website latency will be in the order of 10ms &#8211; which is below the threshold of human perception.</p>
<p>For this to work &#8211; says he, persuasively &#8211; the phone companies will have to rip out much of the  latency-inducing intermediate NAT and other session-based crap, moving instead to pure IPv6 solutions. </p>
<p>Whether this will fully presage running webservers on your phones is unclear &#8211; still it would be good to have demand so that technology is nudged that way &#8211; but it&#8217;s a step in the right direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Claire</title>
		<link>http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/article/5420/comment-page-1#comment-27074</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Claire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 07:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dropsafe.crypticide.com/?p=5420#comment-27074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great Talk Alec! 

I was just going to glance at the post and listen tomorrow but I got caught up in it and then had to look go look at a few things, Tor, my phone, The coming war on general computation ... and now its almost 2am!

Thanks for posting the video!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Talk Alec! </p>
<p>I was just going to glance at the post and listen tomorrow but I got caught up in it and then had to look go look at a few things, Tor, my phone, The coming war on general computation &#8230; and now its almost 2am!</p>
<p>Thanks for posting the video!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
